In-Person Versus Virtual Instruction and Simulation for Unplanned Out-of-Hospital Births

INTRODUCTION: Unplanned out-of-hospital births are uncommon and associated with serious complications. Most emergency medical services (EMS) personnel receive little or no instruction on emergent vaginal delivery. Our in-person (IP) lecture and simulation training on emergent vaginal delivery for EMS personnel previously demonstrated improvement in knowledge and confidence. With COVID-19 we adapted the same curriculum into a virtual training session (VTS). In-person simulation increases confidence and knowledge, but less is known about virtual simulation training. The purpose of this study was to assess EMS personnel's knowledge and confidence after IP versus VTS in emergent vaginal delivery. METHODS: The IP and VTS participants received the same lecture on emergent delivery either in-person or virtually. The IP group received in-person simulation training using a birth simulator. The VTS group received simulation training via virtual demonstration on the same model. Participants completed pretraining and posttraining surveys to assess knowledge and confidence. Responses were analyzed and compared using Student's t test. RESULTS: Ninety-eight participants (59 IP, 39 VTS) participated with 100% survey completion. Pretraining knowledge scores were similar (IP 45% versus VTS 37%, P =.22). Although both groups showed improvement, the IP group had significantly higher posttraining knowledge scores (IP 99% versus VTS 75%, P <.01). More IP participants reported confidence in performing emergent delivery after training (IP 100% versus VTS 51%, P <.01). CONCLUSION: Live in-person instruction and simulation training of emergent vaginal delivery among EMS personnel results in higher knowledge scores and confidence when compared to virtual instruction and simulation training. Further evaluation is needed to determine generalizability to other learner groups. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Obstetrics & Gynecology is the property of Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

Pre-COVID and COVID experience of objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) as a learning tool for post-graduate residents in Obstetrics & Gynecology - a quality improvement study.

Objective: Due to its comprehensive, reliable, and valid format, the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is the gold standard for assessing the clinical competency of medical students. In the present study, we evaluated the importance of the OSCE as a learning tool for postgraduate (PG) residents assessing their junior undergraduate students. We further aimed to analyze quality improvement during the pre-coronavirus disease (COVID) and COVID periods. Methods: This quality-improvement interventional study was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. The PG residents were trained to conduct the OSCE. A formal feedback form was distributed to 22 participants, and their responses were analyzed using a five-point Likert scale. Fishbone analysis was performed, and the 'plan-do-study-act' (PDSA) cycle was implemented to improve the OSCE. Results: Most of the residents (95%) believed that this examination system was extremely fair and covered a wide range of clinical skills and knowledge. Further, 4.5% believed it was more labor- and resource intensive and time-consuming. Eighteen (81.8%) residents stated that they had learned all three domains: communication skills, time management skills, and a stepwise approach to clinical scenarios. The PDSA cycle was run eight times, resulting in a dramatic improvement (from 30% to 70%) in the knowledge and clinical skills of PGs and the standard of OSCE. Conclusion: The OSCE can be used as a learning tool for young assessors who are receptive to novel tools. The involvement of PGs in the OSCE improved their communication skills and helped overcome human resource limitations while manning various OSCE stations.

Using virtual methods to teach Clinical Communication Skills: a survey: Presenter(s): Panayiota Andreou, University of Nicosia, Cyprus

The COVID-19 pandemic presented the education community with an enormous challenge where educators were called to adjust and shift their teaching in most cases from onsite settings to online environments. This transition was abrupt and required adjustments, and in most cases without the necessary expertise or infrastructure. This study aimed to assess the impact of Covid-19 pandemic on the conventional Methods: of teaching clinical communication skills (CCS) as compared to virtual Methods: of teaching. A convenience sample of EACH members involved in medical student CCS education were invited to complete an online survey comprising of 34 quantitative and qualitative questions about the use of virtual Methods: of teaching CCS. The data was analyzed using frequencies and content analysis. Forty-six (46) participants from 19 countries and a range of disciplines completed the survey. For most participants, very little of the CCS education was conducted online prior COVID-19. Once the transition was done online, most of the teaching was delivered synchronously (happening in real time) as opposed to asynchronous (e.g. recorded lectures). Participants reported that the transition from onsite to online was relatively smooth;online consultations minimized class distractions and enabled greater focus on student-simulated patient interaction. Areas that did not work well included missing on non-verbal cues both from the role-plays and the group;online sessions were viewed as a second-best option to onsite teaching. Online CCS teaching was forced to scale up within a short space of time. This study provides valuable insight of the challenges educators faced in this transition, their reflection on the strengths and weakness of online teaching as well as about the adaptability of educators, students and simulated patients in this change. It is envisaged this work will highlight areas to strengthen the skills and infrastructure of online CCS teaching. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Patient Education & Counseling is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Can We Agree on Standards? International Voices in Simulated Patient Education: Presenter(s): Emily Ruba, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, United States

Simulated (or standardized) patients (SPs) play a crucial role in the teaching and assessment of communication skills in healthcare. As this methodology has evolved, the SP educator has emerged as its own profession. In 2017, an international team from the Association of SP Educators (ASPE) published Standards of Best Practice (SOBPs) to guide practitioners. Investigators sought to assess the applicability of the SOBPs to the diverse contexts in which SP educators work around the world. In this study, investigators addressed two questions: 1. Are SOBPs relevant to SP educators around the world?;and 2. How can the SOBPs be enhanced or altered in future iterations? Investigators used 60-minute, semi-structured interviews with 12 respondents from 11 countries. Researchers used purposive sampling. Respondents were intentionally recruited from 6 continents. Respondents included individuals who are active SP educators, but who are not ASPE members. All interviews were recorded and transcribed. The data were analyzed using NVivo and investigators used thematic analysis. While respondents provided many insights into the SOBPs and SP methodology, preliminary analysis has revealed three main themes. First, respondents described the role of the SOBPs in affirming current practices and guiding the development of future practices, including domains of safety in simulation and quality control. Second, respondents described how the SOBPs enable professional development through empowering evidence-based practice and promoting scholarship. Third, respondents offered recommendations for adaptation of the SOBPs to online simulation in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic. Successful simulation requires the utilization of practices most likely to lead to optimal learner outcomes. This study indicates that SP educators around the world view ASPE's SOBPs as a powerful tool providing both guidance and flexibility. Results: suggest that the SOBPs serve as a valuable guide for working with SPs in diverse cultural contexts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Patient Education & Counseling is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Learning Model to Achieve Clinical Reasoning Competency Using Technology-Enhanced Learning in Neurology Clinical Rotation: An Exploratory Study

The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated major adaptations in learning activities related to developing clinical reasoning competencies in neurology clerkship. The application of technology in this context is promising, but there are also several limitations. This study explores a learning model for achieving clinical reasoning competency using technology-enhanced learning in neurology clinical rotation. The study used a case-study design and was conducted at the Faculty of Medicine of YARSI University and its two teaching hospitals. Data were collected by document analysis, three focus group discussions with eight medical students and 20 postgraduate medical students, and five in-depth interviews with five neurologists. All the transcribed data were analysed with thematic analysis using the Steps for Coding and Theorization (SCAT) approach. Two themes were revealed--contributing factors and learning strategies--and six factors were found to influence the learning model: the quantity and quality of teacher interactions, students' motivation and skills in learning and technology, the variety and number of patients in teaching hospitals, the quality and quantity of facilities and infrastructure for service and education at the teaching hospitals, the clinical rotation programme design, and learning adaptation during the pandemic. The following technology-enhanced learning strategies for developing clinical reasoning skills were identified: blended learning, online logbook, telemedicine, collaborative online learning between teaching hospitals, and learning videos. This learning model can be implemented in a limited resource setting. Importantly, the identified factors from the perspective of students, clinical teachers, and school of medicine/teaching hospital, as well as technical factors, should be considered for the implementation of this model. [ FROM AUTHOR]

An online case-based teaching and assessment program on clinical history-taking skills and reasoning using simulated patients in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has created unprecedented challenges for medical students and educators worldwide. Groups 1, 2 and 3 of year 3, semester 2 medical students at the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (n = 275) had only completed 2, 5 and 7 weeks, respectively, of their scheduled 10-week clinical medicine and surgery attachments, prior to the Irish shutdown of all in-person non-essential activities, including medical student education. METHODS: We developed and delivered an online case-based program, focused on history-taking skills and clinical reasoning, using simulated patients and video technologies. 12 tutorials were delivered over 6 weeks to 35 subgroups of 8 students in line with program learning outcomes. Both simulated patients (n = 36), and tutors (n = 45, from retired clinical professors to newly graduated physicians), were rapidly upskilled in Blackboard Collaborate and Microsoft Teams, and also in the provision of constructive feedback. We evaluated this newly developed program by the following three criteria: student attendance, achieved grades, and student feedback. RESULTS: Attendance at the 12 tutorials was higher amongst group 1 and 2 students (75 and 73%) by comparison with group 3 students (60%) (p = < 0.001). Of the 273 students that sat the Year 3 Semester 2 online long case assessment, 93% were successful. Despite group 1 students having the least prior clinical experience, results were similar to those of groups 2 and 3 (1st honors, 2nd honors, pass, and fail grades for group 1, 39%, 33%, 23% and 6%; group 2, 34%, 41%, 17% and 8%; group 3, 39%, 25%, 28% and 7%) (p = 0.48). An increased attendance rate at tutorials was associated with higher numbers of honors grades (p = < 0.001). Anonymous feedback from the students demonstrated considerable satisfaction with program: > 85% agreed that the online program was interactive and very educational. CONCLUSIONS: Use of online video technology, tutors of varied experience, and simulated patients were demonstrated to replicate patient encounters, and to facilitate the development of clinical skills remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Improving Conversations With COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitant Patients: Action Research to Support Family Physicians.

Vaccination delivery and efforts to counter vaccine hesitancy have become focal issues for family medicine teams as the COVID-19 pandemic has evolved. Conducting action research, our team developed an interactive web-based guide to improve clinical conversations around a broad range of vaccine hesitancies presented by patients. The paper presents a step-by-step account of the guide being codesigned with family physicians-its targeted end users-in a process that included validation interviews; role-play interviews; and user-tested design. The validation interviews sought to understand the pragmatic realities of vaccine hesitancy in family medicine clinical practice relative to relevant psychological theories. The role-play interviews drew out conversational strategies and advice from family physicians. The principles of motivational interviewing-an evidence-based approach to vaccine hesitancy conversations that supplements information deficit approaches-were used to codesign the content and layout of the guide. User counts, stakeholder engagement, and web-based analytics indicate the guide is being used extensively. Formal evaluation of the guide is presently underway.Originally published as Annals "Online First" article.

Observational Study Exploring the Efficacy and Effectiveness of a New Model of Peer-Assisted Simulation-Based Learning Clinical Placement.

(1) Background: Immersive simulation-based learning is relevant and effective in health care professional pre-licensure training. Peer-assisted learning has reciprocal benefit for the learner and the teacher. A fully simulated model of fieldwork placement has been utilised at Curtin University since 2014, historically employing full-time faculty supervisors. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, traditional clinical placement availability diminished. (2) Methods: This mixed-methods prospective observational study aimed to translate the existing faculty-led placement for penultimate-year physiotherapy students to a peer-taught model, thereby creating new teaching placements for final-year students. Final- and penultimate-year physiotherapy students undertook the fully simulated fieldwork placement either as peer learners or peer teachers. The placement was then evaluated using four outcome measures: The 'measure of quality of giving feedback scale' (MQF) was used to assess peer learner satisfaction with peer-teacher supervision; plus/delta reflections were provided by peer teachers and faculty supervisors; student pass/fail rates for the penultimate-year physiotherapy students. (3) Results: For 10 weeks during November and December 2020, 195 students and 19 faculty participated in the placement. Mean MQF scores ranged from 6.4 (SD 0.86) to 6.8 (SD) out of 7; qualitative data reflected positive and negative aspects of the experience. There was a 4% fail rate for penultimate-year students for the placement. Results suggested that peer learners perceived peer-led feedback was of a high quality; there were both positives and challenges experienced using the model. (4) Conclusions: Physiotherapy students effectively adopted a peer-taught fully simulated fieldwork placement model with minimal faculty supervision, and comparable clinical competency outcomes.

The Multisplit Ventilator System: Performance Testing of Respiratory Support Shared by Multiple Patients

Ventilator sharing has been proposed as a method of increasing ventilator capacity during instances of critical shortage. We sought to assess the ability of a regulated, shared ventilator system, the multisplit ventilator system, to individualize support to multiple simulated patients using one ventilator. We employed simulated patients of varying size, compliance, minute ventilation requirement, and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) requirement. Performance tests were performed to assess the ability of the system, versus control, to achieve individualized respiratory goals to clinically disparate patients sharing a single ventilator following ARDSNet guidelines (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome). Resilience tests measured the effects of simulated adverse events occurring to one patient on another patient sharing a single ventilator. The multisplit ventilator system met individual oxygenation and ventilation requirements for multiple simulated patients with a tolerance similar to that of a single ventilator. Abrupt endotracheal tube occlusion or extubation occurring to one patient resulted in modest, clinically tolerable changes in ventilation parameters for the remaining patients. The proof-of-concept ventilator system presented in this paper is a regulated, shared ventilator system capable of individualizing ventilatory support to clinically dissimilar simulated patients. It is resilient to common adverse events and represents a feasible option to ventilate multiple patients during a severe ventilator shortage. Copyright © 2022 by ASME.

Multiple Mechanical Ventilation: historical review and cost analysis

In times of crisis in public health where the resources available in the hospital network are scarce and these must be used to the fullest, innovative ideas arise, which allow multiplying the use of existing resources, as artificial mechanical ventilators can be. These can be used in more than one patient, by attaching a device to distribute the mixture of air and oxygen from the ventilator being used simultaneously (multiple mechanical ventilation). This idea, although innovative, has generated controversy among the medical community, as many fear for the safety of their patients, because attaching such devices to the ventilator loses control over the mechanical ventilation variables of each patient and can only maintain general vigilance over the ventilator. These misgivings about the device have led several researchers to take on the task of verifying the reliability of this flow splitter connector. It is for this reason that this article presents a thorough review of the studies carried out on the subject and additionally shows an analysis of comparative costs between the acquisition of a mechanical ventilator and the flow division system.

Classroom teaching with simulated patients during COVID-19: the communication skills course in the second year of the model medical curriculum HannibaL.

Objective: In the spring of 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the question arose at Hannover Medical School as to how simulated patients (SP) could still be utilized in the communication course that is part of the module "Diagnostic methods" taught in the second year of the model medical curriculum known as HannibaL. Methods: This short report summarizes the process of implementing the utilization of SP in analog classroom teaching and describes the relevant results on the concluding Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in comparison to the previous year. Results: Overall, the analog SP deployments were practicable under local conditions and in compliance with precautionary measures to curb the risk of infection, whereby the OSCE scores did not deviate significantly from those in the prior year. Conclusion: During the COVID-19 pandemic and perhaps other epidemics as well, it will continue to be important in the future to make locally adapted, purpose-oriented, and preventively effective decisions regarding university didactics in undergraduate studies.